Volume 6, Issue 24 (Fall 2018)
IUESA 2018, 6(24): 81-98 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Poorahmad A, Piri E, Mohammadi Y, Parsa S, Heydari S. Good Urban Governance in Urban Neighborhoods (Case: Marivan City). IUESA 2018; 6 (24) :81-98
URL: http://iueam.ir/article-1-971-en.html
URL: http://iueam.ir/article-1-971-en.html
1- Department of Human Geography, Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
2- Faculty of Social Sciences, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran ,asmailpirii@yahoo.com
3- Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran
4- Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
5- Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
2- Faculty of Social Sciences, Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran ,
3- Allameh Tabatabaei University, Tehran, Iran
4- Faculty of Geography, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
5- Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (5467 Views)
Good urban governance is one of the concepts that it takes into consideration the general welfare of citizens and its policies and programs are within the framework of specific indicators. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to investigate good urban governance indicators in the central neighborhoods of Marivan city, (1, 2, 4, 14). The data and information of this research were collected in two ways, library and survey, that in the survey method, the questionnaire tool was used that validity and reliability were confirmed by experts in this field. The total sample size was estimated at 380 people using the Cochran formula, the sampling method is non-random and questionnaires were distributed randomly among citizens. SPSS and Excel software were used to analyze the data, and given the normality of the data, ANOVA test was used. Using Tukey’s test, the differences between each neighborhood were investigated. The results indicated that in the neighborhoods studied, good urban governance indexes are not in desirable condition. The first and 14th neighborhoods do not have a significant difference in terms of accountability, consistency orientation and justice, and in other indices, these two neighborhoods have significant differences with each other. This significant difference is not high due to the difference in the average of the indices studied in both neighborhoods, and it can be said that the status of urban governance indicators in these two neighborhoods, like the two and four neighborhoods, is not in a desirable situation, and all of them are on almost the same level.
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
Special
Received: 2017/10/25 | Accepted: 2018/08/7 | Published: 2018/08/7 | ePublished: 2018/08/7
Received: 2017/10/25 | Accepted: 2018/08/7 | Published: 2018/08/7 | ePublished: 2018/08/7
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
