Volume 4, Issue 16 (Fall 2016)                   IUESA 2016, 4(16): 107-125 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Safari S, Beyginiya A, Samizadeh M, Zakerifar S J. Designing and Organizing Measurement Components of Urban Management Function by Emphasizing on Good Urban Governance and Balanced Evaluation. IUESA. 2016; 4 (16) :107-125
URL: http://iueam.ir/article-1-548-en.html
1- Associate Professor, Department of Industrial Management Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
2- Assistant Professor, Department of Management (Governmental-commercial), Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
3- Ph.D. of Marketing Management , University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
4- M.Sc. of Governmental Management Shahed University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract:   (3105 Views)

Much attempt has been focused on changing and improving the structure and form of designing performance evaluation systems so far and less attention has been paid to content of issues.  Thus, this research aims to design performance measurement indicators in urban management by integrating balanced evaluation model (for structural aspect) and components of good governance approved by the United Nations Development Programme (for content aspect) in the field of organizational performance. In order to access to research purpose, after redefining the components of good governance in four aspects of balanced evaluation via semi-structured depth interviews with executive managers of municipality and university professors, 103 indicators in the first step, and 95 indicators in the second step were extracted to measure the performance of urban management. In the following, these indicators were evaluated with Delphi method by academic and organizational experts. The results indicated that 73 indicators were confirmed by academic and organizational experts among designed ones given eight good governance components and four aspects of balanced evaluation for performance measurement. Thus, these indicators are appropriate guides for better development of performance evaluation system in urban economics for managers to be aware of impacts and consequences of organization’s administrative decisions and plans.

Full-Text [PDF 712 kb]   (1148 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Special
Received: 2015/05/6 | Accepted: 2015/10/10 | Published: 2016/12/20

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
Write the security code in the box

Send email to the article author


© 2015 All Rights Reserved | Journal of Urban Economics and Management

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb